How risky is it to spend time in a classroom? Ride the bus?
|This mathematical model helps estimate the riskiness of different activities based on one potential route of coronavirus spread: itty-bitty particles known as aerosols.|
“Measure the risk of airborne COVID-19 in your office, classroom, or bus ride
Can kids go back to crowded schools? Is it safe to eat dinner with friends? Use this mathematical model to help provide some clues.
“AMID THE PANDEMIC, once normal activities are now peppered with questions and concerns. Can kids go back to crowded schools? Is it safe to eat dinner with friends? Should we worry about going for a run?
A recent modeling effort may help provide some clues. Led by Jose-Luis Jimenez at the University of Colorado Boulder, the charts below estimate the riskiness of different activities based on one potential route of coronavirus spread: itty-bitty particles known as aerosols. (Read more about what “airborne coronavirus” means and how to protect yourself).
The risk of infection from SARS-CoV-2 aerosols
An indoor gathering – A poorly ventilated space with pervasive talking and movement
An energy-efficient office – A space with very low airflow and moderate talking and movement 100% 20 min.
Strenuous outdoor activity – Vigorous exercise in direct sunlight
A subway ride – Well-ventilated public transit system with minimal talking and movement
A bus ride – Decently ventilated public transit mode with minimal talking and movement
The risk of infection from SARS-CoV-2 aerosols if you experience a given scenario 20 times
- An indoor gathering
- An energy-efficient office
- A classroom lecture
- Strenuous outdoo
- r activity
- A subway ride
- A bus ride
- In a well-fitted N95 mask… Vs. …and with no masks.
- In a low infection area… Vs. …and in an infection hot spot.
With 20 square feet of space per person… Vs. …and with three square feet per person.
But many scientists have also grown concerned about the potential risks of aerosols—the smallest of these particles—which may float across rooms and cause infections. It’s a worry that’s greatest where ventilation is poor and airborne particulates could build. While the World Health Organization recently acknowledged that aerosol transmission cannot be ruled out for some situations, they emphasized more research is needed to conclusively demonstrate its role in the spread of the virus.
“We do not have a ton of information, but we cannot afford to wait for a ton of information,” Jimenez says.
The new model incorporates what is known about the coronavirus’ spread from case reports of potential airborne transmission, such as the Washington choir practice where one person was linked to dozens of other infections during a 2.5-hour rehearsal. It’s further calibrated based on studies that attempt to untangle how much virus people emit while performing activities that involve exhalation. An important note: the model does not account for how the risk increases with closer proximity, where droplet and aerosol concentrations will be higher, or for people touching their eyes or noses with contaminated hands.”